Shoop v. Hill

Total
0
Shares

Holding: Because Danny Hill’s intellectual disability claim must be evaluated based solely on holdings of the Supreme Court that were clearly established at the time the state-court decisions were rendered, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit’s reliance on Moore v. Texas — which was handed down much later — was plainly improper.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on January 7, 2019.

You May Also Like

Biden v. Sierra Club

Issues: (1) Whether respondents have a cognizable cause of action to obtain a review of the acting secretary of defense’s compliance with a proviso in Section 8005 of the Department…
View More

Moore v. Texas

Holding: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ redetermination that Bobby James Moore does not have an intellectual disability and is thus eligible for the death penalty is inconsistent with the…
View More

Yovino v. Rizo

Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred when it counted as a member of the majority a judge who died before the court’s opinion, in this…
View More