United States v. Washington

Holding: Washington’s workers’ compensation law is unconstitutional under the supremacy clause because it facially discriminates against the federal government and does not fall within the scope of the federal waiver…
View More

George v. McDonough

Holding: The invalidation of a Department of Veterans Affairs regulation after a veteran’s benefits decision becomes final cannot support a claim for collateral relief permitting revision of that decision based…
View More

Golan v. Saada

Holding: A court is not categorically required to examine all possible ameliorative measures before denying a Hague Convention petition for return of a child to a foreign country once the…
View More

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas

Holding: The federal legislation at issue — the Ysleta del Sur and Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act — bans as a matter of federal law on tribal lands…
View More

Kemp v. United States

Holding: The term “mistake” in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) includes a judge’s errors of law; because Dexter Kemp’s motion alleged such an error, it was cognizable under Rule 60(b)(1) and…
View More

ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.

Holding: Although 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) permits a district court to order discovery “for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal,” only a governmental or intergovernmental adjudicative body may…
View More

Denezpi v. United States

Holding: The double jeopardy clause does not bar successive prosecutions of distinct offenses arising from a single act, even if a single sovereign prosecutes them. Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion…
View More

Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Holding: Congress’ enactment of a significant fee increase that exempted debtors in two states violated the uniformity requirement of the bankruptcy clause. Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by…
View More

Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon

Holding: Airplane cargo loaders and ramp supervisors who, like petitioner Latrice Saxon, frequently load and unload airplane cargo belong to a “class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce”…
View More

Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon

Holding: Airplane cargo loaders and ramp supervisors who, like petitioner Latrice Saxon, frequently load and unload airplane cargo belong to a “class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce”…
View More