Salman v. United States

Total
0
Shares

Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit properly applied the court’s decision in Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission to affirm Bassam Salman’s conviction because, under Dirks, the jury could infer that Salman’s tipper personally benefited from making a gift of confidential information to a trading relative.

Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on December 6, 2016.

You May Also Like

New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira

Holding: A court should determine whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s Section 1 exclusion for disputes involving the “contracts of employment” of certain transportation workers applies before ordering arbitration; here, truck…
View More

Hemphill v. New York

Holding: The trial court’s admission—over Hemphill’s objection—of the plea allocution transcript of an unavailable witness violated Hemphill’s Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him. Judgment: Reversed and Remanded, 8-1,…
View More

Brown v. Davenport

Holding: When a state court has ruled on the merits of a state prisoner’s claim, a federal court cannot grant habeas relief without applying both the test the Supreme Court…
View More

Wooden v. United States

Holding: William Dale Wooden’s ten burglary offenses arising from a single criminal episode did not occur on different “occasions” and thus count as only one prior conviction under the Armed…
View More