Holding: This case, about whether plaintiffs can state a claim against retirement-plan fiduciaries for breach of duty of prudence by alleging that the costs of undisclosed fraud grow over time, is vacated and remanded to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit for a determination on whether to consider two arguments raised in the briefs at the Supreme Court but not in the lower courts.
You May Also Like
United States v. Vaello-Madero
legaladmin
Holding: The Constitution does not require Congress to extend Supplemental Security Income benefits to residents of Puerto Rico. Judgment: Reversed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on April 21, 2022.…
United States v. Tsarnaev
Holding: The judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit vacating Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s capital sentences is reversed. Judgment: Reversed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on March…
Gallardo v. Marstiller
Holding: The Medicaid Act permits a state to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care. Judgment: Affirmed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 6, 2022.…
Wolf v. Vidal
Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Trump v. NAACP
Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC
Holding: A bankruptcy court’s order unreservedly denying relief from the automatic stay constitutes a final, immediately appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).
