Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht

Holding: “Clear evidence” that the Food and Drug Administration would not have approved a change to a drug’s label – thus pre-empting a state-law failure-to-warn claim – is evidence showing…
View More

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt

Holding: Nevada v. Hall is overruled; states retain their sovereign immunity from private suits brought in courts of other states. Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on May…
View More

Biestek v. Berryhill

Holding: A vocational expert’s refusal to provide private market-survey data during a Social Security disability benefits hearing upon the applicant’s request does not categorically preclude the testimony from counting as…
View More

Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert

Holding: Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which establishes a 14-day deadline to seek permission to appeal an order granting or denying class certification, is not subject to equitable tolling. Judgment: Reversed…
View More

Yovino v. Rizo

Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred when it counted as a member of the majority a judge who died before the court’s opinion, in this…
View More

Dawson v. Steager

Holding: By taxing the federal pension benefits of U.S. Marshals Service retiree James Dawson, while exempting from taxation the pension benefits of certain state and local law enforcement officers, West…
View More

Moore v. Texas

Holding: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ redetermination that Bobby James Moore does not have an intellectual disability and is thus eligible for the death penalty is inconsistent with the…
View More

Madison v. Alabama

Holding: The Eighth Amendment may permit executing a prisoner even if he cannot remember committing his crime, but it may prohibit executing a prisoner who suffers from dementia or another…
View More