Trump v. New York

Holding: Because the challengers have not shown standing and because the claims presented are not ripe for adjudication, the district court’s judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded with…
View More

Shinn v. Kayer

Holding: A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit granting post-conviction relief to a man on Arizona’s death row for his claim of ineffective assistance of…
View More

Sharp v. Murphy

Holding: The judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Judgment: Affirmed in a per curiam opinion on July 9,…
View More

Wolf v. Vidal

Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
View More

Trump v. NAACP

Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
View More

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I

Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
View More