Mayorkas v. Innovation Law Lab

Issue(s): (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security policy known as the Migrant Protection Protocols is a lawful implementation of the statutory authority conferred by 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(2)(C); (2) whether MPP…
View More

Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
View More

Yellen v. Collins

Holding: Because the Federal Housing Finance Agency did not exceed its authority under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 as a conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,…
View More

Alaska v. Wright

Holding: The requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) that a habeas petitioner be “in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court” is not met if the state judgment is simply…
View More

Mays v. Hines

Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in revisiting on federal habeas review the decision of a Tennessee court supported by ample evidence that did not…
View More

Biden v. Sierra Club

Issues: (1) Whether respondents have a cognizable cause of action to obtain a review of the acting secretary of defense’s compliance with a proviso in Section 8005 of the Department…
View More

Arkansas v. Gresham

Issue(s): Whether the approval by the secretary of health and human services of the Arkansas Works Amendment was lawful.
View More

Terry v. U.S.

Holding: A sentence reduction under the First Step Act is available only if an offender’s prior conviction of a crack cocaine offense triggered a mandatory minimum sentence.
View More