Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP

Holding: A business engaged in no more than nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, except for the limited purpose of enforcing…
View More

City of Escondido, California v. Emmons

Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit failed to conduct the analysis required by Supreme Court precedents in determining whether two Escondido police officers were entitled to…
View More

New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira

Holding: A court should determine whether the Federal Arbitration Act’s Section 1 exclusion for disputes involving the “contracts of employment” of certain transportation workers applies before ordering arbitration; here, truck…
View More

Shoop v. Hill

Holding: Because Danny Hill’s intellectual disability claim must be evaluated based solely on holdings of the Supreme Court that were clearly established at the time the state-court decisions were rendered,…
View More

United States v. Sims

Holding: The term “burglary” in the Armed Career Criminal Act includes burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation. Judgment: Reversed, 9-0,…
View More

United States v. Stitt

Holding: The term “burglary” in the Armed Career Criminal Act includes burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation. Judgment: Reversed, 9-0,…
View More

Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido

Holding: State and local governments are covered by employers under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 regardless of the number of employees they have. Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an…
View More

Gray v. Wilkie

Judgment vacated and case remanded with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. §…
View More