Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools

Total
0
Shares

Exhaustion of the administrative procedures established by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is unnecessary when the gravamen of the plaintiff’s suit is something other than the denial of the IDEA’s core guarantee of a “free appropriate public education”; and (2) the case is remanded to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit for a proper analysis of whether the gravamen of E.F.’s complaint — which alleges only disability-based discrimination, without making any reference to the adequacy of the special-education services E.F.’s school provided — charges, and seeks relief for, the denial of a FAPE.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on February 22, 2017. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Thomas joined.

You May Also Like

Gallardo v. Marstiller

Holding: The Medicaid Act permits a state to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care. Judgment: Affirmed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 6, 2022.…
View More

United States v. Tsarnaev

Holding: The judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit vacating Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s capital sentences is reversed. Judgment: Reversed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on March…
View More

Wolf v. Vidal

Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
View More

Trump v. NAACP

Holding: The Department of Homeland Security’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
View More