Holding: The Federal Communications Commission’s 2017 decision to repeal or modify three of its media ownership rules was not arbitrary or capricious for purposes of the Administrative Procedure Act.
You May Also Like
Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
legaladmin
Holding: A business engaged in no more than nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, except for the limited purpose of enforcing…
JOSE LOERA VS STACEY LIMBADA
Document for Jose Loera vs. Stacey Limbada, Pony Tracks Ranch LLC 21-CIV-06118 Answer to Amended Complaint 30 1 DEFENDANT/ CROSS-COMPLAINANT PONY TRACKS RANCH, LLC AND DEFENDANT STACEY LIMBADA
Johnson v. Guzman Chavez
Holding: The detention of a noncitizen ordered removed from the United States who reenters without authorization is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1231. Judgment: Reversed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice…
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
Holding: Nevada v. Hall is overruled; states retain their sovereign immunity from private suits brought in courts of other states. Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on May…
Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
Holding: Registration occurs, and a copyright claimant may commence an infringement suit, when the Copyright Office registers a copyright. Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on March 4,…
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda
Holding: An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
