Holding: To convict a defendant under 26 U. S. C. §7212(a) — which forbids “corruptly or by force or threats of force . . . obstruct[ing] or imped[ing], or endeavor[ing] to obstruct or impede, the due administration of [the Internal Revenue Code]” — the federal government must prove the defendant was aware of a pending tax-related proceeding, such as a particular investigation or audit, or could reasonably foresee that such a proceeding would commence.
You May Also Like
Yellen v. Collins
- legaladmin
- June 13, 2021
Holding: Because the Federal Housing Finance Agency did not exceed its authority under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 as a conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,…
Trump v. New York
- legaladmin
- December 20, 2020
Holding: Because the challengers have not shown standing and because the claims presented are not ripe for adjudication, the district court’s judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded with…
Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I
- legaladmin
- June 17, 2020
Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
Van Buren v. United States
- legaladmin
- November 3, 2021
Holding: An individual “exceeds authorized access” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2), when he accesses a computer with authorization but then obtains information…
Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I
- legaladmin
- June 17, 2021
Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service
- legaladmin
- January 20, 2020
Holding: A suit to enjoin IRS Notice 2016–66 does not trigger the Anti-Injunction Act even though a violation of the notice may result in a tax penalty. Judgment: Reversed and remanded,…