Holding: A decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit granting post-conviction relief to a man on Arizona’s death row for his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel violated the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
You May Also Like
Alabama Association of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Services
- legaladmin
- August 28, 2021
Holding: The district court’s judgment – which vacated as unlawful the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s imposition of a nationwide moratorium on evictions of any tenants who live in…
Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, California
- legaladmin
- June 28, 2021
Holding: Administrative exhaustion of state remedies is not a prerequisite for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim when the government has reached a conclusive position.
Dunn v. Reeves
- legaladmin
- July 2, 2021
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit erred in characterizing the Alabama court’s case-specific analysis as a “categorical rule” that any prisoner will always lose an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel…
Alaska v. Wright
- legaladmin
- May 26, 2021
Holding: The requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) that a habeas petitioner be “in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court” is not met if the state judgment is simply…
Mays v. Hines
- legaladmin
- March 29, 2021
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in revisiting on federal habeas review the decision of a Tennessee court supported by ample evidence that did not…
Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
- legaladmin
- January 25, 2021
Holding: Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.