Dawson v. Steager

  • February 20, 2019
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Holding: By taxing the federal pension benefits of U.S. Marshals Service retiree James Dawson, while exempting from taxation the pension benefits of certain state and local law enforcement officers, West Virginia unlawfully discriminates against Dawson as 4 U.S.C. §111 forbids.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on February 20, 2019.

Dawson-v.-SteagerDownload
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Share 0
You May Also Like

Yellen v. Collins

Holding: Because the Federal Housing Finance Agency did not exceed its authority under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 as a conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,…
View More

Trump v. New York

Holding: Because the challengers have not shown standing and because the claims presented are not ripe for adjudication, the district court’s judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded with…
View More

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I

Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
View More
  • 93 views
  • 1 minute read

Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
View More