CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service

Total
0
Shares

Holding: A suit to enjoin IRS Notice 2016–66 does not trigger the Anti-Injunction Act even though a violation of the notice may result in a tax penalty.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on May 17, 2021. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kavanaugh filed concurring opinions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Yellen v. Collins

Holding: Because the Federal Housing Finance Agency did not exceed its authority under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 as a conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,…
View More

Trump v. New York

Holding: Because the challengers have not shown standing and because the claims presented are not ripe for adjudication, the district court’s judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded with…
View More

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe I

Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
View More

Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I

Holding: To plead facts sufficient to support a domestic application of the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, plaintiffs must allege more domestic conduct than general corporate activity. Judgment: Reversed and…
View More